Restrict access to version for ofs
- Gigiipse
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 40
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 1 month ago #11392
by Gigiipse
Restrict access to version for ofs was created by Gigiipse
Is it possible (without a routine) to deny access to a version to users yet allow the use of ofs for that routine?
That means the users will have rights in USER.SMS.GROUP to access the version.
I want to lock amounts on accounts from a local routine using OFS but I don't want to allow the users to use AC.LOCKED.EVENTS.
That means the users will have rights in USER.SMS.GROUP to access the version.
I want to lock amounts on accounts from a local routine using OFS but I don't want to allow the users to use AC.LOCKED.EVENTS.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2859
- Thank you received: 650
13 years 1 month ago #11394
by jpb
Without a routine using SMS is the only way. Is it really needed that all users have access to you OFS-version ?
Give them access to another version when they have to see / amend the locked events.
Replied by jpb on topic Re: Restrict access to version for ofs
That means the users will have rights in USER.SMS.GROUP to access the version.
Without a routine using SMS is the only way. Is it really needed that all users have access to you OFS-version ?
Give them access to another version when they have to see / amend the locked events.
Attachment USG.jpg not found
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gigiipse
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 40
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 1 month ago #11396
by Gigiipse
Replied by Gigiipse on topic Re: Restrict access to version for ofs
The problem is that the ofs generated from the local application will get SECURITY.VIOLATION if the users don't have rights in SMS, so I have to give rights in SMS. But I also don't want them to use the version for anything other then the execution of those OFSes.
So a user will be able to execute the LOCAL.APPLICATION (and generate an OFS for AC.LOCKED.ACCOUNTS,OFS) but the user must not be able to access it from the COMMAND.LINE.
So a user will be able to execute the LOCAL.APPLICATION (and generate an OFS for AC.LOCKED.ACCOUNTS,OFS) but the user must not be able to access it from the COMMAND.LINE.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2859
- Thank you received: 650
13 years 1 month ago #11397
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic Re: Restrict access to version for ofs
That's easy - take away the command-line (and user abbreviations) from all users as we did (we were forced to do by our external audit) ;-)
Earnestly:
How do you pass the OFS, can't you use a generic user for this ?
Earnestly:
How do you pass the OFS, can't you use a generic user for this ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gigiipse
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 40
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 1 month ago - 13 years 1 month ago #11399
by Gigiipse
Replied by Gigiipse on topic Re: Restrict access to version for ofs
I use OFS.GLOBUS.MANAGER. I have R05 and can use this inside the APPLICATION code. I find it easier to use and is faster then OFS.POST.MESSAGE. I could use a generic user and this is a solution we're considering, but it would be harder on us when we'll have to do the reports with the activity of each user (not impossible, but harder). I was considering to put a user in OFS.SOURCE (I don't put the user and password in the OFS so the system will automaticaly take the logged in user).
Yes, we could also do the take away the command-line (and user abbreviations) but I can already hear the endless moaning from operations department that I'm makeing their live hard on purpouse.
Yes, we could also do the take away the command-line (and user abbreviations) but I can already hear the endless moaning from operations department that I'm makeing their live hard on purpouse.
Last edit: 13 years 1 month ago by Gigiipse.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jpb
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- retired . . . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Less
More
- Posts: 2859
- Thank you received: 650
13 years 1 month ago #11400
by jpb
Replied by jpb on topic Re: Restrict access to version for ofs
Our users had the command line only during test BEFORE going live and they still complain about loosing it (10 years ago).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.034 seconds